Examiner Ruixiang Li

Grant ratio: 55.7% (74th percentile in Art Unit 1646 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.94. Most common rejection type: §112.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.94
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78733
Primary art unit
1646
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,053
Granted applications
586
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0875
Supervisor
Vanessa L Ford
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0857

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 41.9% 1.89
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 2,080 office actions across 1,053 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,051 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 487 46.2%
2 OAs 328 31.1%
3 OAs 108 10.3%
4 OAs 73 6.9%
5+ OAs 55 5.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 29.8% 2008 2009: 53.2% 2009 2010: 35.8% 2010 2011: 43.1% 2011 2012: 43.9% 2012 2013: 41.9% 2013 2014: 43.1% 2014 2015: 50.9% 2015 2016: 63.6% 2016 2017: 61.9% 2017 2018: 81.0% 2018 2019: 73.7% 2019 2020: 70.3% 2020 2021: 84.8% 2021 2022: 70.2% 2022 2023: 67.8% 2023 2024: 81.0% 2024 2025: 42.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008571729.8%
2009623353.2%
2010672435.8%
2011512243.1%
2012572543.9%
2013431841.9%
2014652843.1%
2015532750.9%
2016553563.6%
2017633961.9%
2018423481.0%
2019574273.7%
2020644570.3%
2021665684.8%
2022473370.2%
2023594067.8%
2024584781.0%
2025492142.9%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,051 1.0% 21.8% 29.2% 38.8%
Action 2 564 1.8% 14.5% 27.8% 47.2%
Action 3 236 2.1% 14.8% 34.7% 41.5%
Action 4 128 0.8% 16.4% 32.0% 43.0%
Action 5 55 1.8% 14.5% 43.6% 27.3%
Action 6 23 0.0% 21.7% 47.8% 30.4%
Action 7 13 0.0% 15.4% 46.2% 38.5%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 243 office actions
All years 1.3% 28 of 2,080 office actions
Change -0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.2%
4.1%
2.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
3.6%
1.9%
1.9%
2.7%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2020 15/129,811 Affirmed §103
Dec. 17, 2020 15/513,132 Affirmed §103
Aug. 16, 2016 11/578,257 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 11, 2016 13/060,753 Reversed §112
Oct. 27, 2015 12/036,588 Reversed N/A
Mar. 6, 2015 11/603,356 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 12, 2012 10/723,955 Reversed §101 · §112
Nov. 1, 2011 11/016,106 Affirmed §101 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.