Examiner Regina M. Deberry

Grant ratio: 44.7% (39th percentile in Art Unit 1647 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.56. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 44.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.56
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78151
Primary art unit
1647
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
640
Granted applications
286
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0882
Supervisor
Joanne Hama
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2911

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 36 42.4% 1.60
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.43 1,557 office actions across 640 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 635 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.8%
1 OA 209 32.7%
2 OAs 231 36.1%
3 OAs 78 12.2%
4 OAs 49 7.7%
5+ OAs 68 10.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 66.7% 2007 2008: 64.7% 2008 2009: 44.4% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 56.3% 2011 2012: 40.0% 2012 2013: 42.9% 2013 2014: 53.8% 2014 2015: 45.5% 2015 2016: 42.5% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 56.0% 2018 2019: 57.6% 2019 2020: 37.5% 2020 2021: 45.9% 2021 2022: 76.2% 2022 2023: 41.9% 2023 2024: 34.4% 2024 2025: 22.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20073266.7%
2008342264.7%
2009361644.4%
2010321650.0%
2011321856.3%
2012451840.0%
2013351542.9%
2014261453.8%
2015331545.5%
2016401742.5%
2017362466.7%
2018251456.0%
2019331957.6%
2020321237.5%
2021371745.9%
2022211676.2%
2023311341.9%
2024321134.4%
202531722.6%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 635 0.3% 18.6% 39.1% 19.8%
Action 2 426 1.2% 15.3% 32.6% 35.2%
Action 3 195 1.0% 11.8% 40.5% 33.3%
Action 4 117 0.9% 18.8% 44.4% 21.4%
Action 5 68 0.0% 8.8% 51.5% 29.4%
Action 6 44 0.0% 13.6% 54.5% 27.3%
Action 7 27 0.0% 7.4% 55.6% 29.6%
Action 8 14 0.0% 7.1% 50.0% 35.7%
Action 9 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
Action 10 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 228 office actions
All years 0.6% 10 of 1,557 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
1.3%
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.1%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.1%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 25, 2026 17/445,572 Affirmed §103
Nov. 27, 2019 13/657,594 Reversed §103
May. 23, 2019 13/136,801 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 26, 2017 11/898,470 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Jul. 24, 2014 12/238,840 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.