Examiner Louise Humphreyhumphrey

Grant ratio: 53.1% (21st percentile in Art Unit 1648 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.02. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2025
Grant ratio 53.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.02
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81174
Primary art unit
1648
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
341
Granted applications
181

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 56.7% 1.92
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.05 702 office actions across 343 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 343 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 140 40.8%
2 OAs 119 34.7%
3 OAs 43 12.5%
4 OAs 27 7.9%
5+ OAs 14 4.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 28.6% 2008 2009: 36.0% 2009 2010: 41.9% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 76.1% 2012 2013: 62.5% 2013 2014: 59.5% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 63.6% 2018 2020: 42.9% 2020 2022: 100.0% 2022 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200821628.6%
2009501836.0%
2010431841.9%
2011402050.0%
2012675176.1%
2013483062.5%
2014372259.5%
20156466.7%
2016400.0%
2017100.0%
201811763.6%
20207342.9%
202211100.0%
2024300.0%
20252150.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 343 1.2% 15.2% 63.3% 12.2%
Action 2 203 2.0% 9.4% 63.5% 15.8%
Action 3 84 1.2% 7.1% 65.5% 15.5%
Action 4 41 2.4% 2.4% 68.3% 12.2%
Action 5 14 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 7.1%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% 22.2%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 14 office actions
All years 1.4% 10 of 702 office actions
Change -1.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
1.4%
2014: Alice
6.1%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
10.0% 1/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
10.0% 1/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 9, 2018 13/641,590 Reversed §103
Dec. 19, 2016 13/688,468 Affirmed §103
Nov. 10, 2016 13/028,819 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §120
Aug. 2, 2016 12/230,566 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 26, 2016 13/269,195 Affirmed §103
Feb. 8, 2016 11/917,169 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 8, 2013 10/515,253 Affirmed §103
Jul. 11, 2012 11/338,908 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 7, 2011 10/258,150 Affirmed §103
Feb. 28, 2011 10/518,523 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.