Examiner Christina M Borgeest

Grant ratio: 48.2% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1649 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.24. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 48.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.24
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81521
Primary art unit
1649
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
782
Granted applications
377
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4482
Supervisor
Jeffrey Stucker
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0911

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 16 41.0% 2.12
Group 221 43.1% 1.95
Tech Center 1,383 37.4% 2.02
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.11 1,653 office actions across 782 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 782 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 315 40.3%
2 OAs 252 32.2%
3 OAs 106 13.6%
4 OAs 69 8.8%
5+ OAs 40 5.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 53.8% 2008 2009: 42.4% 2009 2010: 32.4% 2010 2011: 40.9% 2011 2012: 44.7% 2012 2013: 44.7% 2013 2014: 57.1% 2014 2015: 54.5% 2015 2016: 45.5% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 55.6% 2018 2019: 78.9% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 66.7% 2021 2022: 69.7% 2022 2023: 46.5% 2023 2024: 54.0% 2024 2025: 32.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200813753.8%
2009331442.4%
2010371232.4%
2011441840.9%
2012381744.7%
2013381744.7%
2014422457.1%
2015331854.5%
2016552545.5%
2017362466.7%
2018452555.6%
2019383078.9%
2020483675.0%
2021332266.7%
2022332369.7%
2023432046.5%
2024502754.0%
2025561832.1%
20266700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 782 1.2% 14.6% 32.7% 15.5%
Action 2 467 4.9% 10.9% 34.9% 23.1%
Action 3 215 4.7% 8.8% 39.5% 22.3%
Action 4 109 7.3% 6.4% 41.3% 25.7%
Action 5 40 5.0% 7.5% 55.0% 17.5%
Action 6 24 0.0% 4.2% 37.5% 33.3%
Action 7 11 0.0% 27.3% 36.4% 18.2%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.3% 10 of 299 office actions
All years 3.1% 52 of 1,653 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
3.8%
2014: Alice
4.8%
2.8%
5.8%
3.4%
3.3%
2019: PEG
2.2%
1.0%
1.3%
6.0%
6.6%
2024: AI examples
1.1%
2025: August memo
3.8%
5.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 27, 2022 14/303,492 Affirmed §112
Aug. 30, 2018 12/761,297 Affirmed §101 · §103
Aug. 30, 2018 13/169,897 Affirmed §101 · §103
Aug. 30, 2018 12/888,172 Affirmed §101 · §103
Dec. 18, 2017 14/515,399 Affirmed §101
Sep. 20, 2016 12/521,793 Affirmed §101
Dec. 11, 2012 11/931,326 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.