Examiner Susan Emily Fernandez

Grant ratio: 45.1% (48th percentile in Art Unit 1651 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 45.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80626
Primary art unit
1651
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
605
Granted applications
273
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3444
Supervisor
Adam Weidner
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3045

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 40.5% 2.10
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.43 1,472 office actions across 606 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 606 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 217 35.8%
2 OAs 183 30.2%
3 OAs 95 15.7%
4 OAs 54 8.9%
5+ OAs 57 9.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 100.0% 2008 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 63.6% 2012 2013: 64.9% 2013 2014: 54.8% 2014 2015: 56.7% 2015 2016: 47.1% 2016 2017: 44.7% 2017 2018: 46.7% 2018 2019: 43.6% 2019 2020: 48.6% 2020 2021: 47.1% 2021 2022: 54.5% 2022 2023: 54.5% 2023 2024: 48.8% 2024 2025: 20.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200811100.0%
201011100.0%
2011341750.0%
2012332163.6%
2013372464.9%
2014422354.8%
2015301756.7%
2016341647.1%
2017381744.7%
2018452146.7%
2019391743.6%
2020351748.6%
2021341647.1%
2022331854.5%
2023331854.5%
2024412048.8%
202544920.5%
20265100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 606 2.1% 5.6% 62.5% 6.6%
Action 2 389 4.4% 8.7% 67.1% 17.2%
Action 3 206 4.4% 7.8% 68.9% 16.0%
Action 4 111 2.7% 3.6% 86.5% 5.4%
Action 5 57 3.5% 3.5% 80.7% 12.3%
Action 6 37 0.0% 5.4% 89.2% 5.4%
Action 7 21 0.0% 9.5% 81.0% 9.5%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 8.3%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 22.2%
Action 10 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 4 of 283 office actions
All years 3.0% 44 of 1,472 office actions
Change -1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2014: Alice
4.9%
10.8%
9.6%
2.8%
1.8%
2019: PEG
3.3%
4.2%
1.9%
2.3%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
2.2%
1.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 8, 2021 15/381,638 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 30, 2020 15/107,133 Reversed §101
Sep. 3, 2019 14/208,959 Reversed §102
Jan. 28, 2019 14/211,078 Affirmed §100 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.