Examiner Lora E. Barnhart

Grant ratio: 24.6% (41st percentile in Art Unit 1653 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.42. Most common rejection type: §102.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 24.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.42
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80546
Primary art unit
1653
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
414
Granted applications
102
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1928
Supervisor
Timothy Speer
Supervisor phone
(313) 446-4825

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 28.7% 2.39
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.32 961 office actions across 414 applications
Applications with office actions 98.3% 407 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.7%
1 OA 138 33.3%
2 OAs 117 28.3%
3 OAs 71 17.1%
4 OAs 45 10.9%
5+ OAs 36 8.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 25.0% 2008 2009: 22.9% 2009 2010: 30.2% 2010 2011: 25.7% 2011 2012: 28.2% 2012 2013: 30.5% 2013 2014: 26.2% 2014 2015: 25.6% 2015 2024: 40.0% 2024 2025: 16.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008401025.0%
2009481122.9%
2010531630.2%
201135925.7%
2012391128.2%
2013591830.5%
2014421126.2%
2015431125.6%
20245240.0%
202518316.7%
20263200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 407 0.2% 78.4% 8.6% 5.7%
Action 2 269 1.9% 28.6% 39.4% 15.2%
Action 3 152 2.0% 71.7% 18.4% 2.0%
Action 4 81 1.2% 50.6% 24.7% 8.6%
Action 5 36 0.0% 69.4% 11.1% 5.6%
Action 6 10 0.0% 50.0% 30.0% 10.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% 25.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.7% 3 of 82 office actions
All years 1.0% 10 of 961 office actions
Change +2.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
7.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 26, 2016 10/730,549 Affirmed §103
May. 17, 2016 10/296,885 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 25, 2015 11/676,668 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 22, 2013 11/435,204 Affirmed §112
Apr. 25, 2012 10/200,939 Affirmed §103
Jan. 20, 2012 11/069,239 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 27, 2011 10/263,516 Reversed §103
Jun. 17, 2011 10/704,253 Affirmed §103
Dec. 17, 2010 10/195,909 Reversed §103 · §112
Oct. 27, 2010 10/195,341 Reversed §112
Jun. 18, 2010 10/976,399 Dismissed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.