Examiner Jeanette Lieb

Grant ratio: 73.3% (93rd percentile in Art Unit 1654 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.56. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 73.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.56
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87371
Primary art unit
1654
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
783
Granted applications
574
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3490
Supervisor
Lianko Garyu
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7367

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 47.0% 1.83
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.56 1,222 office actions across 783 applications
Applications with office actions 98.0% 767 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 16 2.0%
1 OA 487 62.2%
2 OAs 185 23.6%
3 OAs 54 6.9%
4 OAs 23 2.9%
5+ OAs 18 2.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 64.0% 2011 2012: 45.7% 2012 2013: 61.3% 2013 2014: 67.4% 2014 2015: 80.6% 2015 2016: 86.7% 2016 2017: 85.1% 2017 2018: 86.7% 2018 2019: 83.6% 2019 2020: 83.1% 2020 2021: 82.1% 2021 2022: 92.5% 2022 2023: 79.6% 2023 2024: 81.1% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20102150.0%
2011251664.0%
2012351645.7%
2013311961.3%
2014432967.4%
2015675480.6%
2016756586.7%
2017675785.1%
2018605286.7%
2019615183.6%
2020655483.1%
2021393282.1%
2022403792.5%
2023544379.6%
2024373081.1%
2025451840.0%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 767 4.3% 11.9% 40.2% 7.8%
Action 2 280 2.1% 13.9% 52.9% 10.0%
Action 3 95 3.2% 13.7% 65.3% 6.3%
Action 4 41 2.4% 12.2% 53.7% 17.1%
Action 5 18 5.6% 11.1% 61.1% 5.6%
Action 6 10 0.0% 10.0% 60.0% 10.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.7% 3 of 180 office actions
All years 3.6% 44 of 1,222 office actions
Change -1.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.9%
4.2%
7.2%
14.5%
2019: PEG
9.1%
6.5%
0.0%
4.3%
2.7%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
5.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 18, 2022 16/288,571 Affirmed §103
Aug. 13, 2020 13/825,601 Reversed §101 · §102 · §112
Apr. 15, 2019 14/035,450 Affirmed §103
Aug. 4, 2017 13/219,394 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.