Examiner Kristina M Hellman

Grant ratio: 58.4% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 1654 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.88
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89000
Primary art unit
1654
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
754
Granted applications
440
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2836
Supervisor
Lianko Garyu
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7367

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 47.0% 1.83
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.89 1,428 office actions across 754 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 751 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 349 46.3%
2 OAs 240 31.8%
3 OAs 96 12.7%
4 OAs 42 5.6%
5+ OAs 24 3.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 72.7% 2012 2013: 41.7% 2013 2014: 61.0% 2014 2015: 59.7% 2015 2016: 72.3% 2016 2017: 71.7% 2017 2018: 63.2% 2018 2019: 72.2% 2019 2020: 73.6% 2020 2021: 70.6% 2021 2022: 70.4% 2022 2023: 58.7% 2023 2024: 70.0% 2024 2025: 26.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201211872.7%
2013482041.7%
2014593661.0%
2015674059.7%
2016473472.3%
2017533871.7%
2018573663.2%
2019543972.2%
2020533973.6%
2021513670.6%
2022543870.4%
2023462758.7%
2024503570.0%
2025521426.9%
20265200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 751 2.0% 9.9% 34.8% 12.8%
Action 2 402 3.0% 4.2% 37.6% 24.6%
Action 3 162 5.6% 4.3% 39.5% 23.5%
Action 4 66 6.1% 3.0% 42.4% 13.6%
Action 5 24 0.0% 0.0% 45.8% 12.5%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% 11.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 20.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.2% 12 of 285 office actions
All years 2.8% 40 of 1,428 office actions
Change +1.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2014: Alice
6.2%
1.8%
3.4%
0.0%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
5.4%
0.0%
1.1%
4.3%
2024: AI examples
7.4%
2025: August memo
1.8%
5.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 19, 2018 12/854,551 Affirmed §103
Mar. 28, 2017 12/715,203 Affirmed in part §103
Oct. 26, 2016 12/891,240 Affirmed §103
Jun. 10, 2016 13/409,594 Affirmed New ground of rejection §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.