Examiner Patricia A. Leith

Grant ratio: 34.6% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1655 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.50. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2016
Grant ratio 34.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.50
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77489
Primary art unit
1655
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
454
Granted applications
157

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 29.7% 2.10
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.40 1,089 office actions across 454 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 454 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 154 33.9%
2 OAs 140 30.8%
3 OAs 78 17.2%
4 OAs 43 9.5%
5+ OAs 39 8.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 27.0% 2008 2009: 27.4% 2009 2010: 22.0% 2010 2011: 30.6% 2011 2012: 51.7% 2012 2013: 35.4% 2013 2014: 39.4% 2014 2015: 41.3% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008371027.0%
2009732027.4%
2010591322.0%
2011491530.6%
2012583051.7%
2013652335.4%
2014662639.4%
2015461941.3%
201611100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 454 0.7% 11.9% 70.7% 13.9%
Action 2 300 1.3% 11.0% 71.3% 15.0%
Action 3 160 3.1% 6.3% 66.3% 20.6%
Action 4 82 7.3% 4.9% 63.4% 18.3%
Action 5 39 5.1% 0.0% 74.4% 12.8%
Action 6 20 0.0% 10.0% 75.0% 15.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 7.7% 76.9% 15.4%
Action 8 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.8% 20 of 1,089 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.7%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.7%
2014: Alice
7.6%
8.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 23, 2015 10/951,850 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 6, 2015 12/261,328 Affirmed §103
Oct. 25, 2013 11/924,871 Affirmed §103
Jun. 26, 2013 11/591,511 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 8, 2012 10/749,602 Affirmed §103
Dec. 1, 2011 11/566,356 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 21, 2011 10/505,015 Reversed §103
Jul. 11, 2011 10/180,773 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 2, 2011 10/271,186 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.