Examiner Catheryne Chen

Grant ratio: 33.9% (45th percentile in Art Unit 1655 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 33.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.70
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82623
Primary art unit
1655
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
841
Granted applications
285
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9947
Supervisor
Terry Mckelvey
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0775

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 29.7% 2.10
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.42 2,035 office actions across 841 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 834 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 0.8%
1 OA 299 35.6%
2 OAs 230 27.3%
3 OAs 122 14.5%
4 OAs 96 11.4%
5+ OAs 87 10.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 7.7% 2008 2009: 9.6% 2009 2010: 20.9% 2010 2011: 29.2% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 26.3% 2013 2014: 18.3% 2014 2015: 27.5% 2015 2016: 40.8% 2016 2017: 48.3% 2017 2018: 44.2% 2018 2019: 53.3% 2019 2020: 57.7% 2020 2021: 60.0% 2021 2022: 51.4% 2022 2023: 48.5% 2023 2024: 62.5% 2024 2025: 25.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20083937.7%
20095259.6%
201043920.9%
201124729.2%
20126350.0%
201319526.3%
2014711318.3%
2015802227.5%
2016763140.8%
2017602948.3%
2018431944.2%
2019452453.3%
2020523057.7%
2021452760.0%
2022351851.4%
2023331648.5%
2024241562.5%
202536925.0%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 834 1.8% 14.5% 63.3% 1.8%
Action 2 535 4.3% 13.3% 73.6% 2.8%
Action 3 305 4.3% 12.1% 73.8% 4.9%
Action 4 183 2.7% 9.3% 79.8% 4.4%
Action 5 87 2.3% 9.2% 78.2% 8.0%
Action 6 52 5.8% 7.7% 76.9% 5.8%
Action 7 22 13.6% 9.1% 68.2% 4.5%
Action 8 11 9.1% 0.0% 72.7% 18.2%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 6.6% 15 of 227 office actions
All years 3.2% 65 of 2,035 office actions
Change +3.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2014: Alice
9.5%
3.8%
4.5%
1.7%
2.1%
2019: PEG
1.8%
2.4%
2.1%
2.9%
4.2%
2024: AI examples
7.5%
2025: August memo
9.6%
4.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 9, 2026 16/972,950 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 30, 2019 13/821,775 Affirmed §101 · §112
Mar. 6, 2018 14/056,402 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Oct. 6, 2016 11/339,135 Reversed §103
Mar. 17, 2015 11/934,143 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.