Examiner Kara D Johnson

Grant ratio: 61.8% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 1657 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 61.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89247
Primary art unit
1657
Work group
1650
Technology center
1600
Applications
537
Granted applications
332
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1414
Supervisor
Peter Paras
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4517

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 46.3% 2.07
Group 208 40.4% 2.00
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.28 1,226 office actions across 537 applications
Applications with office actions 98.1% 527 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 1.9%
1 OA 183 34.1%
2 OAs 181 33.7%
3 OAs 58 10.8%
4 OAs 60 11.2%
5+ OAs 45 8.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 63.6% 2013 2014: 51.5% 2014 2015: 61.1% 2015 2016: 72.4% 2016 2017: 80.5% 2017 2018: 58.8% 2018 2019: 85.7% 2019 2020: 82.1% 2020 2021: 72.2% 2021 2022: 80.0% 2022 2023: 75.0% 2023 2024: 68.6% 2024 2025: 21.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
2012100.0%
2013442863.6%
2014331751.5%
2015362261.1%
2016584272.4%
2017413380.5%
2018513058.8%
2019211885.7%
2020393282.1%
2021362672.2%
2022403280.0%
2023282175.0%
2024352468.6%
202528621.4%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 527 1.7% 12.5% 59.4% 6.1%
Action 2 344 2.3% 6.7% 73.0% 12.2%
Action 3 163 3.1% 3.1% 73.6% 14.1%
Action 4 105 2.9% 5.7% 71.4% 15.2%
Action 5 45 4.4% 4.4% 75.6% 13.3%
Action 6 23 4.3% 4.3% 65.2% 21.7%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 18.2%
Action 8 4 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 217 office actions
All years 2.3% 28 of 1,226 office actions
Change -1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.1%
5.4%
6.3%
3.8%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.3%
2.6%
1.4%
3.8%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 24, 2019 12/818,757 Reversed §101
Mar. 15, 2019 13/362,993 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 25, 2017 12/889,170 Affirmed §103 · §120

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.