Examiner Saeed T. Chaudhry

Grant ratio: 74.2% (81st percentile in Art Unit 1711 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.80. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2017
Grant ratio 74.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.80
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
68988
Primary art unit
1711
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
507
Granted applications
376

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 56.0% 1.88
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.78 902 office actions across 507 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 507 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 273 53.8%
2 OAs 145 28.6%
3 OAs 52 10.3%
4 OAs 22 4.3%
5+ OAs 15 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 55.6% 2008 2009: 58.6% 2009 2010: 77.4% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 75.4% 2012 2013: 75.4% 2013 2014: 75.5% 2014 2015: 77.1% 2015 2016: 83.6% 2016 2017: 94.6% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008362055.6%
2009583458.6%
2010624877.4%
2011392666.7%
2012695275.4%
2013574375.4%
2014534075.5%
2015352777.1%
2016615183.6%
2017373594.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 507 0.4% 5.1% 76.5% 15.6%
Action 2 234 0.0% 6.0% 76.5% 12.0%
Action 3 89 0.0% 2.2% 83.1% 12.4%
Action 4 37 0.0% 0.0% 97.3% 0.0%
Action 5 15 0.0% 6.7% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 902 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 29, 2016 12/519,670 Affirmed §103
Sep. 18, 2015 12/064,700 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 20, 2014 12/651,530 Reversed N/A
Feb. 13, 2013 12/055,002 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 29, 2013 10/583,621 Affirmed in part N/A
Nov. 14, 2011 11/043,237 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.