Examiner Jason Riggleman

Grant ratio: 58.0% (44th percentile in Art Unit 1711 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.07. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2021
Grant ratio 58.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.07
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82934
Primary art unit
1711
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
522
Granted applications
303

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 56.0% 1.88
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.03 1,063 office actions across 524 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 524 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 229 43.7%
2 OAs 163 31.1%
3 OAs 60 11.5%
4 OAs 49 9.4%
5+ OAs 23 4.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 32.1% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 39.6% 2010 2011: 21.6% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 63.0% 2014 2015: 59.1% 2015 2016: 72.1% 2016 2017: 82.2% 2017 2018: 78.9% 2018 2019: 79.5% 2019 2020: 76.6% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008531732.1%
2009301860.0%
2010532139.6%
201137821.6%
2012402050.0%
2013241250.0%
2014462963.0%
2015442659.1%
2016433172.1%
2017453782.2%
2018191578.9%
2019393179.5%
2020473676.6%
202122100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 524 0.0% 13.0% 72.1% 10.3%
Action 2 295 0.0% 10.5% 72.9% 12.5%
Action 3 132 0.0% 5.3% 74.2% 14.4%
Action 4 72 0.0% 9.7% 69.4% 16.7%
Action 5 23 0.0% 4.3% 91.3% 4.3%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,063 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
72.7% 8/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 11/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 11, 2017 12/910,203 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112 · §120
Mar. 31, 2015 12/084,874 Reversed N/A
Aug. 16, 2013 11/536,862 Reversed §103
Mar. 21, 2013 10/578,386 Reversed N/A
Sep. 20, 2012 11/838,480 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 24, 2012 11/044,396 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 17, 2012 10/940,374 Reversed N/A
Mar. 26, 2012 11/393,967 Reversed N/A
Mar. 15, 2012 10/573,457 Affirmed in part N/A
Nov. 22, 2011 11/446,933 Reversed §103
Oct. 25, 2010 11/033,707 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.