Examiner Lisha Jiang

Grant ratio: 40.4% (28th percentile in Art Unit 1712 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.18. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2018
Grant ratio 40.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.18
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86948
Primary art unit
1712
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
342
Granted applications
138

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 33.9% 2.59
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.47 943 office actions across 382 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 382 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 142 37.2%
2 OAs 106 27.7%
3 OAs 51 13.4%
4 OAs 28 7.3%
5+ OAs 55 14.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 38.6% 2011 2012: 37.8% 2012 2013: 47.9% 2013 2014: 31.3% 2014 2015: 39.4% 2015 2016: 35.0% 2016 2017: 40.0% 2017 2018: 43.5% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20092150.0%
2010301550.0%
2011441738.6%
2012451737.8%
2013482347.9%
2014321031.3%
2015331339.4%
2016401435.0%
2017451840.0%
2018231043.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 382 0.0% 2.9% 78.3% 8.9%
Action 2 240 0.0% 2.1% 82.9% 10.0%
Action 3 134 0.0% 1.5% 85.1% 6.7%
Action 4 83 0.0% 4.8% 80.7% 6.0%
Action 5 55 0.0% 0.0% 92.7% 0.0%
Action 6 29 0.0% 6.9% 75.9% 6.9%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 943 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 12 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
7.7% 1/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
7.7% 1/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 3, 2020 14/379,502 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 17, 2019 13/277,510 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 9, 2019 14/483,870 Affirmed §103
Apr. 2, 2018 14/001,783 Affirmed §103
Dec. 8, 2016 12/209,448 Affirmed §103
Jun. 22, 2016 13/865,855 Affirmed §103
Apr. 29, 2016 12/595,439 Reversed §103
Apr. 26, 2016 12/363,389 Affirmed §103
Jun. 9, 2015 12/871,028 Affirmed N/A
May. 28, 2015 11/850,696 Affirmed N/A
May. 5, 2015 11/803,308 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 17, 2014 12/005,626 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.