Examiner Arlyn I Rivera-Cordero

Grant ratio: 55.7% (74th percentile in Art Unit 1714 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.31. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.31
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87625
Primary art unit
1714
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
377
Granted applications
210
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7680
Supervisor
Kaj Olsen
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1344

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 45.1% 2.28
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.16 815 office actions across 377 applications
Applications with office actions 98.4% 371 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 1.6%
1 OA 151 40.1%
2 OAs 117 31.0%
3 OAs 40 10.6%
4 OAs 31 8.2%
5+ OAs 32 8.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 60.0% 2011 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 38.9% 2013 2014: 54.2% 2014 2015: 53.8% 2015 2016: 65.0% 2016 2017: 68.4% 2017 2018: 56.0% 2018 2019: 66.7% 2019 2020: 69.0% 2020 2021: 60.0% 2021 2022: 80.6% 2022 2023: 75.9% 2023 2024: 62.5% 2024 2025: 41.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201110660.0%
201221733.3%
201318738.9%
2014241354.2%
201513753.8%
2016201365.0%
2017191368.4%
2018251456.0%
2019271866.7%
2020292069.0%
2021201260.0%
2022312580.6%
2023292275.9%
2024322062.5%
2025311341.9%
20262800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 371 0.0% 1.3% 87.6% 4.0%
Action 2 220 0.0% 0.5% 93.2% 3.2%
Action 3 103 0.0% 1.9% 94.2% 2.9%
Action 4 63 0.0% 0.0% 98.4% 1.6%
Action 5 32 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 165 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 815 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
62.5% 5/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 22, 2025 17/289,333 Affirmed §103
Jul. 13, 2023 15/617,966 Affirmed in part §103 · §120
Jan. 12, 2023 16/308,027 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 7, 2022 15/696,537 Reversed N/A
Feb. 26, 2020 14/843,016 Reversed §103 · §112
Jun. 20, 2019 13/618,784 Affirmed §112
Oct. 17, 2018 14/104,104 Reversed §103
Aug. 31, 2017 13/276,889 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.