Examiner Elena Tsoy Lightfoot

Grant ratio: 39.0% (8th percentile in Art Unit 1715 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.99. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2016
Grant ratio 39.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.99
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78009
Primary art unit
1715
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
420
Granted applications
164

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 62.8% 1.79
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.78 1,169 office actions across 420 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 420 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 114 27.1%
2 OAs 130 31.0%
3 OAs 60 14.3%
4 OAs 49 11.7%
5+ OAs 67 16.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 15.5% 2008 2009: 33.8% 2009 2010: 28.3% 2010 2011: 45.9% 2011 2012: 35.3% 2012 2013: 40.0% 2013 2014: 57.4% 2014 2015: 65.2% 2015 2016: 71.4% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200858915.5%
2009682333.8%
2010531528.3%
2011612845.9%
2012341235.3%
2013552240.0%
2014613557.4%
2015231565.2%
20167571.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 420 0.2% 1.2% 82.4% 2.4%
Action 2 306 0.3% 2.0% 84.0% 2.3%
Action 3 176 0.0% 1.1% 88.6% 1.1%
Action 4 116 0.0% 0.9% 91.4% 1.7%
Action 5 67 0.0% 0.0% 92.5% 3.0%
Action 6 42 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 7 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,169 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 36. Merits outcomes: 21 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 13 reversed.

Full reversal rate
36.1% 13/36 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
41.7% 15/36 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.9 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 14, 2016 12/924,868 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 22, 2016 12/822,592 Affirmed §103
Feb. 26, 2016 11/793,837 Reversed §103
Jan. 14, 2016 10/556,092 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 18, 2015 11/815,792 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 28, 2015 12/907,192 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 9, 2015 11/774,710 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 3, 2015 11/833,942 Affirmed §103
Jan. 30, 2015 10/509,295 Reversed §103
Jul. 30, 2014 10/415,201 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 24, 2014 12/113,372 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Aug. 19, 2013 12/210,092 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.