Examiner Allan Olsen

Grant ratio: 81.6% (97th percentile in Art Unit 1716 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.67. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2025
Grant ratio 81.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.67
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74966
Primary art unit
1716
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
729
Granted applications
595

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 41.6% 2.46
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.70 1,246 office actions across 734 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 734 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 402 54.8%
2 OAs 222 30.2%
3 OAs 68 9.3%
4 OAs 29 4.0%
5+ OAs 13 1.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 75.8% 2008 2009: 78.8% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 72.3% 2011 2012: 77.1% 2012 2013: 80.0% 2013 2014: 68.1% 2014 2015: 85.7% 2015 2016: 87.8% 2016 2017: 94.4% 2017 2018: 90.0% 2018 2019: 86.4% 2019 2020: 79.5% 2020 2021: 94.9% 2021 2022: 80.0% 2022 2023: 92.0% 2023 2024: 95.9% 2024 2025: 58.5% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008332575.8%
2009332678.8%
2010151066.7%
2011473472.3%
2012483777.1%
2013504080.0%
2014473268.1%
2015423685.7%
2016413687.8%
2017363494.4%
2018403690.0%
2019595186.4%
2020443579.5%
2021393794.9%
2022403280.0%
2023252392.0%
2024494795.9%
2025412458.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 734 0.4% 30.1% 51.2% 12.3%
Action 2 332 0.3% 28.0% 56.0% 10.8%
Action 3 110 0.0% 23.6% 59.1% 13.6%
Action 4 42 0.0% 19.0% 57.1% 21.4%
Action 5 13 0.0% 7.7% 69.2% 23.1%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.3% 2 of 157 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,246 office actions
Change +1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 7, 2022 15/951,030 Affirmed §103
Sep. 14, 2017 14/100,339 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 30, 2011 11/029,191 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.