Examiner Maureen Gramaglia

Grant ratio: 42.7% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1716 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.63. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2015
Grant ratio 42.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.63
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80403
Primary art unit
1716
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
363
Granted applications
155

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 41.6% 2.46
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.53 917 office actions across 363 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 363 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 105 28.9%
2 OAs 133 36.6%
3 OAs 43 11.8%
4 OAs 36 9.9%
5+ OAs 46 12.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 26.5% 2008 2009: 35.5% 2009 2010: 39.5% 2010 2011: 45.3% 2011 2012: 37.7% 2012 2013: 51.2% 2013 2014: 61.2% 2014 2015: 61.5% 2015

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008491326.5%
2009622235.5%
2010431739.5%
2011532445.3%
2012532037.7%
2013412151.2%
2014493061.2%
201513861.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 363 0.0% 6.3% 73.3% 2.2%
Action 2 258 0.0% 10.9% 75.2% 3.9%
Action 3 125 0.0% 6.4% 82.4% 1.6%
Action 4 82 0.0% 4.9% 84.1% 3.7%
Action 5 46 0.0% 0.0% 93.5% 0.0%
Action 6 29 0.0% 3.4% 75.9% 10.3%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 917 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 25, 2015 12/227,970 Reversed N/A
Dec. 30, 2014 11/046,273 Affirmed §103
Nov. 27, 2013 12/147,871 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 27, 2013 10/989,975 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 21, 2012 10/673,376 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 30, 2011 10/418,996 Reversed §103
Sep. 29, 2010 10/823,371 Reversed §103
Mar. 24, 2010 11/146,309 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.