Examiner Marianne L. Padgett

Grant ratio: 35.3% (15th percentile in Art Unit 1717 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.54. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2020
Grant ratio 35.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.54
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
65627
Primary art unit
1717
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
518
Granted applications
183

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 47.7% 2.21
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.46 1,353 office actions across 549 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 549 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 164 29.9%
2 OAs 177 32.2%
3 OAs 88 16.0%
4 OAs 70 12.8%
5+ OAs 50 9.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 29.8% 2008 2009: 26.7% 2009 2010: 34.9% 2010 2011: 36.7% 2011 2012: 31.7% 2012 2013: 41.7% 2013 2014: 17.9% 2014 2015: 38.5% 2015 2016: 37.1% 2016 2017: 38.5% 2017 2018: 37.1% 2018 2019: 48.6% 2019 2020: 51.9% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008471429.8%
2009601626.7%
2010431534.9%
2011301136.7%
2012411331.7%
2013482041.7%
201439717.9%
2015391538.5%
2016351337.1%
2017391538.5%
2018351337.1%
2019351748.6%
2020271451.9%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 549 0.4% 6.4% 88.9% 1.5%
Action 2 385 0.0% 3.4% 91.9% 3.6%
Action 3 208 0.0% 3.8% 92.3% 2.9%
Action 4 120 0.8% 0.0% 86.7% 7.5%
Action 5 50 0.0% 2.0% 90.0% 4.0%
Action 6 25 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 4.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,353 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 22. Merits outcomes: 15 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
18.2% 4/22 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
31.8% 7/22 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 25, 2022 15/598,687 Affirmed §103
Dec. 1, 2021 15/263,838 Reversed §103
Jun. 28, 2021 15/346,688 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 22, 2021 15/287,079 Reversed §103
Nov. 19, 2020 14/521,657 Affirmed §103
Sep. 16, 2020 15/060,300 Affirmed §103
Apr. 30, 2019 14/873,790 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120
Aug. 13, 2018 12/362,131 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 13, 2018 12/121,260 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 19, 2018 12/684,241 Affirmed §103
Feb. 5, 2018 11/143,092 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 31, 2017 12/355,612 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.