Examiner William Phillip Fletcher Iii

Grant ratio: 72.5% (85th percentile in Art Unit 1717 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.96. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.96
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78517
Primary art unit
1717
Work group
1710
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,149
Granted applications
833
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1419
Supervisor
Duane Smith
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1166

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 47.7% 2.21
Group 162 46.9% 2.19
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.90 2,188 office actions across 1,149 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 1,142 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 0.6%
1 OA 549 47.8%
2 OAs 339 29.5%
3 OAs 133 11.6%
4 OAs 75 6.5%
5+ OAs 46 4.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 65.3% 2008 2009: 42.0% 2009 2010: 74.2% 2010 2011: 81.8% 2011 2012: 82.0% 2012 2013: 75.6% 2013 2014: 87.8% 2014 2015: 84.1% 2015 2016: 80.2% 2016 2017: 85.7% 2017 2018: 82.6% 2018 2019: 78.1% 2019 2020: 71.4% 2020 2021: 96.4% 2021 2022: 42.3% 2022 2023: 81.1% 2023 2024: 83.3% 2024 2025: 50.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008724765.3%
2009692942.0%
2010896674.2%
2011776381.8%
2012615082.0%
2013785975.6%
2014746587.8%
2015635384.1%
2016866980.2%
2017706085.7%
2018695782.6%
2019645078.1%
2020564071.4%
2021282796.4%
2022261142.3%
2023373081.1%
2024363083.3%
2025532750.9%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,142 0.7% 4.7% 51.6% 30.8%
Action 2 593 0.5% 5.2% 62.7% 20.2%
Action 3 254 0.4% 4.3% 69.3% 17.3%
Action 4 121 0.8% 8.3% 66.9% 15.7%
Action 5 46 0.0% 6.5% 67.4% 17.4%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 85.0% 0.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 192 office actions
All years 0.6% 13 of 2,188 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.5%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
2014: Alice
2.3%
0.0%
1.3%
1.0%
0.8%
2019: PEG
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 22, 2020 14/764,842 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Feb. 11, 2016 12/385,175 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 20, 2012 11/964,960 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 27, 2012 11/510,883 Affirmed §103
Feb. 14, 2012 11/075,609 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.