Examiner Benjamin J. Gillespie

Grant ratio: 13.8% (14th percentile in Art Unit 1723 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2025
Grant ratio 13.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.82
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
70863
Primary art unit
1723
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
80
Granted applications
11

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 43.4% 2.05
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.78 142 office actions across 80 applications
Applications with office actions 86.3% 69 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 13.8%
1 OA 27 33.8%
2 OAs 26 32.5%
3 OAs 10 12.5%
4 OAs 1 1.3%
5+ OAs 5 6.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 0.0% 2009 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2018: 0.0% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 100.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2024: 45.5% 2024 2025: 28.6% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009800.0%
2010600.0%
2011600.0%
2012400.0%
20131500.0%
2014800.0%
2015300.0%
2016200.0%
2018100.0%
20194375.0%
202011100.0%
2021400.0%
202411545.5%
20257228.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 69 0.0% 20.3% 69.6% 4.3%
Action 2 42 0.0% 7.1% 81.0% 7.1%
Action 3 16 0.0% 12.5% 81.3% 6.3%
Action 4 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 5 5 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0%
Action 6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 31 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 142 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 14, 2012 10/521,225 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 22, 2011 10/593,633 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 27, 2011 11/281,006 Affirmed §103
Jul. 13, 2011 11/198,733 Affirmed §103
Jun. 21, 2011 11/198,734 Affirmed §103
Apr. 6, 2011 11/198,722 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.