Examiner Haixia Zhang

Grant ratio: 57.1% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 1723 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.64. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 57.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.64
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90100
Primary art unit
1723
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
319
Granted applications
182
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5697
Supervisor
Tiffany Legette
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7078

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 39 43.4% 2.05
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.78 886 office actions across 319 applications
Applications with office actions 98.7% 315 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 1.3%
1 OA 65 20.4%
2 OAs 110 34.5%
3 OAs 50 15.7%
4 OAs 43 13.5%
5+ OAs 47 14.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 55.6% 2013 2014: 61.9% 2014 2015: 43.8% 2015 2016: 64.3% 2016 2017: 40.0% 2017 2018: 45.0% 2018 2019: 58.6% 2019 2020: 55.6% 2020 2021: 95.0% 2021 2022: 81.0% 2022 2023: 68.8% 2023 2024: 77.8% 2024 2025: 18.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20139555.6%
2014422661.9%
2015321443.8%
2016422764.3%
201715640.0%
201820945.0%
2019291758.6%
2020271555.6%
2021201995.0%
2022211781.0%
2023161168.8%
2024181477.8%
202511218.2%
20261700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 315 0.3% 10.8% 79.0% 0.6%
Action 2 250 0.4% 5.6% 82.4% 6.4%
Action 3 140 0.0% 2.1% 90.0% 6.4%
Action 4 90 0.0% 1.1% 90.0% 3.3%
Action 5 47 0.0% 0.0% 85.1% 4.3%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 5.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 14.3%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 105 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 886 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 28, 2025 13/682,644 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 16, 2022 14/634,353 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 27, 2020 14/065,172 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Mar. 25, 2019 14/559,180 Affirmed §103
Mar. 15, 2019 14/476,168 Reversed §102
May. 22, 2017 13/617,758 Affirmed §103
Apr. 19, 2016 13/149,276 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.