Examiner Lilia V Nedialkova

Grant ratio: 45.0% (41st percentile in Art Unit 1724 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.97. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 45.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.97
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89542
Primary art unit
1724
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
489
Granted applications
220
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1538
Supervisor
Miriam Stagg
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5256

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 54.8% 2.04
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.22 1,573 office actions across 489 applications
Applications with office actions 96.5% 472 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 17 3.5%
1 OA 76 15.5%
2 OAs 138 28.2%
3 OAs 76 15.5%
4 OAs 90 18.4%
5+ OAs 92 18.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 28.6% 2014 2015: 63.6% 2015 2016: 47.4% 2016 2017: 59.0% 2017 2018: 56.3% 2018 2019: 58.1% 2019 2020: 55.0% 2020 2021: 63.6% 2021 2022: 65.5% 2022 2023: 53.1% 2023 2024: 51.6% 2024 2025: 20.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013201050.0%
2014351028.6%
2015332163.6%
2016381847.4%
2017392359.0%
2018321856.3%
2019432558.1%
2020402255.0%
2021221463.6%
2022291965.5%
2023321753.1%
2024311651.6%
202534720.6%
20266100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 472 0.2% 12.5% 69.3% 2.5%
Action 2 396 0.0% 7.3% 81.6% 1.8%
Action 3 258 0.0% 4.3% 87.2% 1.6%
Action 4 182 0.0% 1.6% 89.6% 4.4%
Action 5 92 0.0% 2.2% 85.9% 4.3%
Action 6 64 0.0% 1.6% 92.2% 3.1%
Action 7 38 0.0% 2.6% 89.5% 5.3%
Action 8 25 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 0.0%
Action 9 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 7.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 356 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,573 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
9.1% 1/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 25, 2025 16/929,534 Affirmed §103
May. 24, 2021 14/674,432 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 25, 2020 15/484,630 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 23, 2019 13/590,952 Affirmed §103
Mar. 25, 2019 14/189,123 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Aug. 14, 2017 13/561,701 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
May. 31, 2017 13/350,899 Reversed §103
May. 25, 2016 13/674,425 Affirmed §103
Apr. 29, 2016 13/012,832 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 14, 2016 13/076,556 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Feb. 18, 2016 12/919,421 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.