Examiner Heng M Chan

Grant ratio: 56.3% (48th percentile in Art Unit 1725 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.16. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 56.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.16
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85948
Primary art unit
1725
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
416
Granted applications
234
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5859
Supervisor
Basia Ridley
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1453

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 43.5% 1.88
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.41 1,001 office actions across 416 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 414 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.5%
1 OA 171 41.1%
2 OAs 101 24.3%
3 OAs 54 13.0%
4 OAs 44 10.6%
5+ OAs 44 10.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 16.7% 2008 2009: 39.4% 2009 2010: 51.4% 2010 2011: 68.4% 2011 2012: 71.8% 2012 2013: 59.3% 2013 2014: 33.3% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 78.9% 2016 2017: 63.6% 2017 2018: 78.9% 2018 2019: 72.7% 2019 2020: 52.6% 2020 2021: 59.1% 2021 2022: 58.3% 2022 2023: 62.5% 2023 2024: 56.3% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20086116.7%
2009331339.4%
2010371951.4%
2011382668.4%
2012392871.8%
2013271659.3%
201412433.3%
201510440.0%
2016191578.9%
2017221463.6%
2018191578.9%
2019221672.7%
2020191052.6%
2021221359.1%
202212758.3%
2023241562.5%
202416956.3%
202518950.0%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 414 0.2% 7.7% 76.8% 3.4%
Action 2 243 1.2% 5.8% 82.3% 4.9%
Action 3 142 0.7% 2.8% 77.5% 10.6%
Action 4 88 1.1% 3.4% 84.1% 6.8%
Action 5 44 0.0% 6.8% 86.4% 4.5%
Action 6 30 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 3.3%
Action 7 16 0.0% 12.5% 81.3% 6.3%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.4% 3 of 125 office actions
All years 0.6% 6 of 1,001 office actions
Change +1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.8%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
3.0%
2025: August memo
5.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2023 15/894,963 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 9, 2019 14/815,447 Reversed §103
Feb. 27, 2019 13/876,675 Reversed §112
Jun. 29, 2016 11/729,043 Affirmed §103
Jan. 23, 2014 12/126,568 Affirmed §103
Nov. 26, 2012 11/216,957 Reversed N/A
Jan. 10, 2012 12/016,014 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 3, 2010 10/549,530 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.