Examiner Jonathan G. Leong

Grant ratio: 55.4% (44th percentile in Art Unit 1725 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.86. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: April 2026
Grant ratio 55.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.86
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86842
Primary art unit
1725
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
386
Granted applications
214

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 43.5% 1.88
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.89 1,164 office actions across 403 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 403 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 98 24.3%
2 OAs 125 31.0%
3 OAs 61 15.1%
4 OAs 61 15.1%
5+ OAs 58 14.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 26.3% 2009 2010: 61.7% 2010 2011: 52.9% 2011 2012: 63.3% 2012 2013: 61.2% 2013 2014: 42.9% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 57.1% 2016 2017: 74.3% 2017 2018: 70.8% 2018 2019: 47.4% 2019 2020: 63.6% 2020 2025: 11.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200919526.3%
2010472961.7%
2011341852.9%
2012493163.3%
2013493061.2%
2014351542.9%
2015361850.0%
201614857.1%
2017352674.3%
2018241770.8%
201919947.4%
202011763.6%
20259111.1%
2026500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 403 0.0% 8.9% 76.9% 0.7%
Action 2 305 0.0% 7.9% 82.3% 1.3%
Action 3 180 0.0% 4.4% 88.9% 2.8%
Action 4 119 0.0% 1.7% 93.3% 1.7%
Action 5 58 0.0% 1.7% 89.7% 3.4%
Action 6 37 0.0% 0.0% 91.9% 5.4%
Action 7 19 0.0% 0.0% 94.7% 5.3%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 16 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,164 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 18. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
61.1% 11/18 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 12/18 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.4 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 1, 2020 14/129,865 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Dec. 23, 2019 14/864,042 Reversed §103
Nov. 7, 2019 13/738,428 Reversed §103
Oct. 22, 2019 14/024,540 Affirmed §103
Nov. 7, 2017 14/374,734 Reversed §103
Sep. 27, 2017 12/899,156 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 15, 2016 13/789,803 Affirmed §103
Aug. 31, 2016 12/034,265 Reversed §103
Mar. 31, 2016 12/669,159 Reversed §102
Jan. 27, 2016 13/520,915 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 30, 2014 12/498,461 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Oct. 24, 2014 13/093,492 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.