Examiner James Lee

Grant ratio: 66.5% (69th percentile in Art Unit 1725 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.27. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.27
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87450
Primary art unit
1725
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
777
Granted applications
517
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7937
Supervisor
Nicole Buie-Hatcher
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3879

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 43.5% 1.88
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.27 1,766 office actions across 777 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 776 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 296 38.1%
2 OAs 239 30.8%
3 OAs 98 12.6%
4 OAs 79 10.2%
5+ OAs 64 8.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 47.6% 2011 2012: 64.0% 2012 2013: 62.2% 2013 2014: 68.0% 2014 2015: 73.9% 2015 2016: 69.0% 2016 2017: 80.0% 2017 2018: 69.8% 2018 2019: 71.9% 2019 2020: 83.3% 2020 2021: 81.1% 2021 2022: 84.4% 2022 2023: 81.3% 2023 2024: 83.8% 2024 2025: 45.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011211047.6%
2012503264.0%
2013452862.2%
2014503468.0%
2015463473.9%
2016584069.0%
2017504080.0%
2018433069.8%
2019574171.9%
2020605083.3%
2021534381.1%
2022453884.4%
2023483981.3%
2024373183.8%
2025592745.8%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 776 0.1% 11.9% 71.0% 4.6%
Action 2 480 0.4% 7.9% 74.4% 9.2%
Action 3 241 0.0% 6.6% 74.7% 12.4%
Action 4 143 0.0% 4.2% 78.3% 11.2%
Action 5 64 0.0% 1.6% 81.3% 9.4%
Action 6 34 0.0% 14.7% 61.8% 14.7%
Action 7 12 0.0% 8.3% 41.7% 50.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 284 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,766 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 12, 2022 15/079,239 Affirmed §102
Aug. 27, 2020 14/177,437 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 13, 2019 14/188,667 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.