Examiner Ben Lewis

Grant ratio: 69.5% (85th percentile in Art Unit 1726 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.06. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2018
Grant ratio 69.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.06
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80865
Primary art unit
1726
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
669
Granted applications
465

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 41.0% 2.54
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.11 1,507 office actions across 714 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 714 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 340 47.6%
2 OAs 195 27.3%
3 OAs 73 10.2%
4 OAs 48 6.7%
5+ OAs 58 8.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 54.7% 2008 2009: 52.7% 2009 2010: 57.4% 2010 2011: 74.5% 2011 2012: 62.2% 2012 2013: 74.4% 2013 2014: 75.3% 2014 2015: 82.3% 2015 2016: 80.9% 2016 2017: 62.5% 2017 2018: 66.7% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008532954.7%
2009552952.7%
2010613557.4%
2011513874.5%
2012744662.2%
2013906774.4%
2014775875.3%
2015796582.3%
2016947680.9%
2017322062.5%
20183266.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 714 0.4% 18.3% 79.3% 1.1%
Action 2 374 0.0% 13.1% 83.7% 2.1%
Action 3 179 0.0% 10.6% 88.3% 1.1%
Action 4 106 0.0% 8.5% 90.6% 0.9%
Action 5 58 0.0% 8.6% 87.9% 3.4%
Action 6 35 0.0% 2.9% 94.3% 2.9%
Action 7 20 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 8 14 0.0% 7.1% 92.9% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,507 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.5%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 20. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 12 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 12/20 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 16/20 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 11, 2017 12/362,063 Reversed §103
Dec. 20, 2016 13/307,059 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 18, 2016 13/109,757 Affirmed §103
Feb. 10, 2016 13/157,859 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Apr. 13, 2015 11/587,261 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 18, 2015 13/103,421 Reversed N/A
Mar. 18, 2015 11/451,538 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 29, 2014 10/324,611 Affirmed in part N/A
Dec. 11, 2013 10/454,864 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 15, 2013 11/340,978 Reversed N/A
Sep. 26, 2012 10/721,616 Reversed N/A
Jun. 18, 2012 10/921,313 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.