Examiner Alex Usyatinsky

Grant ratio: 75.2% (91st percentile in Art Unit 1727 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.82
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87646
Primary art unit
1727
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
939
Granted applications
706
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7703
Supervisor
Jonathan Leong
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1292

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 50.1% 2.25
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.77 1,660 office actions across 939 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 933 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.6%
1 OA 457 48.7%
2 OAs 322 34.3%
3 OAs 85 9.1%
4 OAs 51 5.4%
5+ OAs 18 1.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 57.9% 2011 2012: 80.4% 2012 2013: 80.8% 2013 2014: 72.1% 2014 2015: 70.5% 2015 2016: 71.9% 2016 2017: 86.2% 2017 2018: 86.2% 2018 2019: 77.1% 2019 2020: 83.3% 2020 2021: 93.2% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 91.2% 2023 2024: 92.6% 2024 2025: 54.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011191157.9%
2012463780.4%
2013524280.8%
2014614472.1%
2015614370.5%
2016644671.9%
2017585086.2%
2018585086.2%
2019705477.1%
2020665583.3%
2021595593.2%
2022645687.5%
2023686291.2%
2024686392.6%
2025703854.3%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 933 0.0% 2.4% 85.3% 7.4%
Action 2 476 0.0% 1.9% 76.1% 16.8%
Action 3 154 0.0% 3.9% 76.0% 17.5%
Action 4 69 0.0% 7.2% 71.0% 15.9%
Action 5 18 0.0% 5.6% 55.6% 38.9%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 265 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,660 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 17, 2018 14/021,156 Reversed §103
Mar. 28, 2018 13/645,320 Affirmed §103
Dec. 20, 2016 13/252,788 Reversed §103
Oct. 25, 2016 11/972,817 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 6, 2016 13/352,145 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 30, 2014 12/920,186 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.