Examiner Jacob Marks

Grant ratio: 74.7% (98th percentile in Art Unit 1729 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.90. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2023
Grant ratio 74.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.90
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86097
Primary art unit
1729
Work group
1720
Technology center
1700
Applications
677
Granted applications
506

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 44.4% 2.45
Group 264 46.2% 2.20
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 1,357 office actions across 684 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 684 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 341 49.9%
2 OAs 186 27.2%
3 OAs 65 9.5%
4 OAs 50 7.3%
5+ OAs 42 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 37.1% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 42.1% 2011 2012: 53.5% 2012 2013: 60.6% 2013 2014: 66.0% 2014 2015: 81.3% 2015 2016: 81.5% 2016 2017: 85.1% 2017 2018: 92.5% 2018 2019: 89.1% 2019 2020: 91.8% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 85.4% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
2009351337.1%
2010392666.7%
2011381642.1%
2012432353.5%
2013664060.6%
2014503366.0%
2015645281.3%
2016655381.5%
2017474085.1%
2018534992.5%
2019464189.1%
2020494591.8%
20213232100.0%
2022413585.4%
202388100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 684 0.3% 13.9% 77.2% 4.8%
Action 2 343 0.0% 5.2% 91.5% 2.0%
Action 3 157 0.0% 4.5% 92.4% 1.9%
Action 4 92 0.0% 2.2% 91.3% 4.3%
Action 5 42 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 4.8%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,357 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
47.1% 8/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
58.8% 10/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 1, 2017 12/545,673 Reversed §103
Nov. 28, 2016 12/942,863 Affirmed §103
Sep. 15, 2016 12/688,566 Reversed §103
May. 31, 2016 11/508,680 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
May. 27, 2016 12/363,958 Affirmed §103
Feb. 25, 2016 12/448,666 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 1, 2015 12/821,866 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 10, 2015 11/431,919 Reversed N/A
Jun. 24, 2014 12/187,056 Reversed §112
Nov. 6, 2013 11/464,540 Affirmed §103
Feb. 15, 2013 11/563,372 Affirmed §103
Jan. 4, 2013 11/287,446 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.