Examiner Elizabeth A. Bolden

Grant ratio: 78.9% (86th percentile in Art Unit 1731 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.59. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 78.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.59
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79386
Primary art unit
1731
Work group
1730
Technology center
1700
Applications
971
Granted applications
766
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1363
Supervisor
Amber R. Orlando
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3149

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 48.4% 1.87
Group 192 48.0% 1.97
Tech Center 1,816 43.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.57 1,529 office actions across 971 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 960 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 1.1%
1 OA 552 56.8%
2 OAs 292 30.1%
3 OAs 85 8.8%
4 OAs 22 2.3%
5+ OAs 9 0.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 75.0% 2008 2009: 80.0% 2009 2010: 86.3% 2010 2011: 76.7% 2011 2012: 86.5% 2012 2013: 90.9% 2013 2014: 85.2% 2014 2015: 86.4% 2015 2016: 86.4% 2016 2017: 94.0% 2017 2018: 87.0% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 83.8% 2021 2022: 93.5% 2022 2023: 87.9% 2023 2024: 91.8% 2024 2025: 61.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008604575.0%
2009504080.0%
2010514486.3%
2011433376.7%
2012524586.5%
2013555090.9%
2014615285.2%
2015443886.4%
2016595186.4%
2017676394.0%
2018464087.0%
2019644875.0%
2020523975.0%
2021373183.8%
2022464393.5%
2023332987.9%
2024494591.8%
2025493061.2%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 960 0.2% 21.8% 44.4% 1.9%
Action 2 408 0.0% 22.8% 48.8% 4.9%
Action 3 116 0.0% 12.9% 49.1% 12.9%
Action 4 31 0.0% 22.6% 48.4% 16.1%
Action 5 9 0.0% 22.2% 55.6% 0.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 244 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,529 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 13, 2025 16/460,084 Reversed §102
May. 6, 2024 15/891,723 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 22, 2022 15/717,306 Affirmed §103
Jan. 11, 2022 15/283,933 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 25, 2021 15/370,763 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 28, 2019 14/796,575 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 20, 2019 14/270,796 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.