Examiner Caitlin Kiechle

Grant ratio: 52.0% (48th percentile in Art Unit 1733 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.79. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2017
Grant ratio 52.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.79
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84191
Primary art unit
1733
Work group
1730
Technology center
1700
Applications
346
Granted applications
180

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 53.6% 2.02
Group 191 48.8% 1.97
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.66 922 office actions across 346 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 346 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 80 23.1%
2 OAs 121 35.0%
3 OAs 65 18.8%
4 OAs 39 11.3%
5+ OAs 41 11.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 25.0% 2007 2008: 27.8% 2008 2009: 48.1% 2009 2010: 53.1% 2010 2011: 31.0% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 64.6% 2013 2014: 54.8% 2014 2015: 63.6% 2015 2016: 73.7% 2016 2017: 84.6% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20074125.0%
2008361027.8%
2009542648.1%
2010321753.1%
2011421331.0%
2012261350.0%
2013483164.6%
2014422354.8%
201511763.6%
2016382873.7%
2017131184.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 346 0.3% 1.7% 74.9% 0.6%
Action 2 266 0.0% 1.5% 77.4% 1.5%
Action 3 145 0.0% 0.7% 82.8% 2.1%
Action 4 80 0.0% 1.3% 80.0% 2.5%
Action 5 41 0.0% 2.4% 87.8% 0.0%
Action 6 25 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 4.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 922 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
41.7% 5/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 6/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.1 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 15, 2019 13/130,688 Reversed §103
Jun. 28, 2018 13/716,334 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 24, 2016 12/870,873 Affirmed §103
Dec. 22, 2015 11/611,353 Reversed §103
Nov. 4, 2015 12/594,492 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 30, 2015 13/226,126 Affirmed in part N/A
Dec. 9, 2014 12/771,147 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Jan. 28, 2014 10/583,220 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Aug. 30, 2013 11/216,498 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 28, 2013 10/545,003 Reversed N/A
Jan. 10, 2012 10/563,264 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 20, 2011 11/521,911 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.