Examiner Wayne Langel

Grant ratio: 74.8% (70th percentile in Art Unit 1736 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §112.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
60603
Primary art unit
1736
Work group
1730
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,689
Granted applications
1,264
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1353
Supervisor
Anthony Zimmer
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3591

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 58.6% 1.70
Group 191 48.8% 1.97
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.79 3,028 office actions across 1,689 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,682 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 0.4%
1 OA 814 48.2%
2 OAs 570 33.7%
3 OAs 186 11.0%
4 OAs 74 4.4%
5+ OAs 38 2.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 60.2% 2008 2009: 60.2% 2009 2010: 80.9% 2010 2011: 78.5% 2011 2012: 83.1% 2012 2013: 85.4% 2013 2014: 79.5% 2014 2015: 86.8% 2015 2016: 78.4% 2016 2017: 74.1% 2017 2018: 90.0% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 89.7% 2020 2021: 90.5% 2021 2022: 82.7% 2022 2023: 81.5% 2023 2024: 81.2% 2024 2025: 55.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081287760.2%
20091086560.2%
2010947680.9%
2011937378.5%
2012897483.1%
2013968285.4%
2014887079.5%
2015917986.8%
2016745878.4%
2017856374.1%
2018908190.0%
2019926975.0%
2020787089.7%
2021958690.5%
2022756282.7%
2023816681.5%
2024856981.2%
2025804455.0%
20266700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,682 1.8% 0.5% 32.1% 51.0%
Action 2 868 0.7% 0.9% 46.7% 35.0%
Action 3 298 0.3% 0.3% 50.0% 35.6%
Action 4 112 0.0% 0.0% 51.8% 35.7%
Action 5 38 0.0% 0.0% 60.5% 34.2%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 58.8% 23.5%
Action 7 6 16.7% 0.0% 50.0% 33.3%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 425 office actions
All years 1.3% 39 of 3,028 office actions
Change -1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.3%
2.5%
0.6%
4.3%
1.2%
1.2%
2014: Alice
2.9%
1.8%
1.7%
2.5%
0.6%
2019: PEG
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 31, 2020 15/050,659 Affirmed §103
Feb. 6, 2019 14/952,509 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 11, 2015 12/233,246 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2011 11/937,092 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 27, 2010 11/738,093 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.