Examiner Primary Examiner Cam N. Nguyen

Grant ratio: 79.3% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 1736 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.56. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 79.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.56
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74787
Primary art unit
1736
Work group
1730
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,331
Granted applications
1,056
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1357
Supervisor
Anthony Zimmer
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3240

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 58.6% 1.70
Group 191 48.8% 1.97
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.54 2,051 office actions across 1,331 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,331 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 845 63.5%
2 OAs 343 25.8%
3 OAs 94 7.1%
4 OAs 25 1.9%
5+ OAs 24 1.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 66.2% 2008 2009: 73.5% 2009 2010: 80.6% 2010 2011: 84.6% 2011 2012: 82.6% 2012 2013: 87.0% 2013 2014: 95.9% 2014 2015: 91.8% 2015 2016: 85.7% 2016 2017: 84.1% 2017 2018: 98.1% 2018 2019: 84.5% 2019 2020: 86.8% 2020 2021: 83.6% 2021 2022: 90.0% 2022 2023: 87.7% 2023 2024: 92.1% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008714766.2%
2009836173.5%
2010937580.6%
2011786684.6%
2012927682.6%
2013696087.0%
2014747195.9%
2015615691.8%
2016635485.7%
2017635384.1%
2018525198.1%
2019847184.5%
2020534686.8%
2021615183.6%
2022605490.0%
2023817187.7%
2024635892.1%
2025703550.0%
20266000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,331 0.7% 29.4% 50.6% 12.2%
Action 2 486 0.2% 21.4% 49.8% 17.5%
Action 3 143 0.0% 16.8% 64.3% 12.6%
Action 4 49 0.0% 18.4% 63.3% 16.3%
Action 5 24 0.0% 4.2% 62.5% 20.8%
Action 6 13 0.0% 15.4% 61.5% 23.1%
Action 7 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 269 office actions
All years 0.5% 10 of 2,051 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.0%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 28, 2015 12/726,403 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Sep. 21, 2010 10/400,742 Affirmed §103
Jun. 29, 2010 10/739,428 Affirmed §103
Apr. 14, 2010 10/513,041 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.