AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Caroline Beha

Examiner Caroline Beha appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 44.5%, they average 2.91 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.91
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2018-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2529
Predicted Supervisor
Abbas Rashid
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-7457
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1740 - Tires, Adhesive Bonding, Glass/Paper Making, Plastics Shaping and Molding

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
283
Granted Applications
126
Non-Granted Applications
157
Avg OA / Grant
2.91
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1741 , 1748
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 44.5% 2.91
Art Unit 14 59.6% 1.93
Group 195 53.9% 2.05
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2018; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2018 4 1 25.0%
2019 28 10 35.7%
2020 31 14 45.2%
2021 40 31 77.5%
2022 31 18 58.1%
2023 41 26 63.4%
2024 33 21 63.6%
2025 52 5 9.6%
2026 23 0 0.0%

126 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 269 0.4% 1.9% 89.6% 0.0%
2 204 0.0% 0.5% 96.1% 0.0%
3 126 0.0% 0.0% 97.6% 0.0%
4 62 0.0% 0.0% 96.8% 0.0%
5 31 0.0% 0.0% 90.3% 0.0%
6 12 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 8.3%
7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
1.1%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.