Examiner Armand Melendez

Grant ratio: 38.1% (24th percentile in Art Unit 1742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.43. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 38.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.43
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91716
Primary art unit
1742
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
415
Granted applications
158
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0342
Supervisor
Curtis Mayes
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1234

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 52.6% 2.07
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.76 1,145 office actions across 415 applications
Applications with office actions 98.1% 407 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.9%
1 OA 102 24.6%
2 OAs 123 29.6%
3 OAs 70 16.9%
4 OAs 61 14.7%
5+ OAs 51 12.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 20.0% 2015 2016: 45.9% 2016 2017: 50.0% 2017 2018: 47.8% 2018 2019: 57.5% 2019 2020: 55.3% 2020 2021: 64.7% 2021 2022: 36.7% 2022 2023: 45.7% 2023 2024: 34.6% 2024 2025: 10.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014400.0%
201520420.0%
2016371745.9%
2017422150.0%
2018231147.8%
2019402357.5%
2020382155.3%
2021342264.7%
2022301136.7%
2023351645.7%
202426934.6%
202528310.7%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 407 0.0% 5.4% 92.9% 1.2%
Action 2 305 0.0% 2.0% 96.7% 0.3%
Action 3 182 0.0% 0.0% 98.9% 0.5%
Action 4 112 0.0% 0.0% 99.1% 0.9%
Action 5 51 0.0% 0.0% 98.0% 0.0%
Action 6 31 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 295 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,145 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 15, 2026 17/294,116 Affirmed §103
Sep. 5, 2025 15/820,691 Affirmed §103
Jun. 22, 2023 15/701,728 Affirmed §103
Jun. 1, 2018 13/869,406 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.