Examiner Mohammad M Ameen

Grant ratio: 62.3% (67th percentile in Art Unit 1742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.90. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.90
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93366
Primary art unit
1742
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
461
Granted applications
287
Examiner phone
(469) 295-9214
Supervisor
Christine Mills
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8322

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 52.6% 2.07
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.88 866 office actions across 461 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 459 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.4%
1 OA 236 51.2%
2 OAs 122 26.5%
3 OAs 53 11.5%
4 OAs 28 6.1%
5+ OAs 20 4.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 65.0% 2017 2018: 40.0% 2018 2019: 69.6% 2019 2020: 57.1% 2020 2021: 79.2% 2021 2022: 82.0% 2022 2023: 89.4% 2023 2024: 78.3% 2024 2025: 41.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20162150.0%
2017201365.0%
2018351440.0%
2019463269.6%
2020352057.1%
2021534279.2%
2022504182.0%
2023665989.4%
2024463678.3%
2025702941.4%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 459 0.2% 3.1% 91.1% 2.8%
Action 2 223 0.4% 1.3% 91.9% 3.1%
Action 3 101 4.0% 3.0% 91.1% 2.0%
Action 4 48 2.1% 2.1% 95.8% 0.0%
Action 5 20 5.0% 0.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 226 office actions
All years 0.9% 8 of 866 office actions
Change -0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
2.7%
0.0%
2.0%
3.7%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
45.5% 5/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 24, 2024 16/096,233 Reversed §102
Dec. 19, 2023 16/348,117 Affirmed §103
Nov. 21, 2023 15/767,456 Affirmed §103
Jun. 6, 2023 16/251,306 Reversed §103
Feb. 1, 2023 15/264,301 Reversed §103
Oct. 27, 2022 15/772,219 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 28, 2022 14/454,053 Reversed §103
Jan. 14, 2022 15/774,619 Affirmed §103
Nov. 16, 2021 14/770,198 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 1, 2021 15/845,172 Reversed §103
Nov. 18, 2019 14/509,821 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.