Examiner Andrew D Graham

Grant ratio: 46.9% (33rd percentile in Art Unit 1742 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.16. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 46.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.16
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93523
Primary art unit
1742
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
414
Granted applications
194
Examiner phone
(469) 295-9232
Supervisor
Christina Johnson
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1176

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 52.6% 2.07
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.88 1,191 office actions across 414 applications
Applications with office actions 98.8% 409 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.2%
1 OA 113 27.3%
2 OAs 104 25.1%
3 OAs 67 16.2%
4 OAs 52 12.6%
5+ OAs 73 17.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017: 33.3% 2017 2018: 44.8% 2018 2019: 47.1% 2019 2020: 64.6% 2020 2021: 55.2% 2021 2022: 57.8% 2022 2023: 64.3% 2023 2024: 61.0% 2024 2025: 36.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201718633.3%
2018291344.8%
2019341647.1%
2020483164.6%
2021291655.2%
2022452657.8%
2023422764.3%
2024593661.0%
2025632336.5%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 409 0.0% 13.4% 82.9% 3.2%
Action 2 296 0.0% 11.8% 85.1% 2.0%
Action 3 192 0.0% 7.8% 89.1% 3.1%
Action 4 125 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 3.2%
Action 5 73 0.0% 2.7% 93.2% 2.7%
Action 6 49 0.0% 4.1% 93.9% 2.0%
Action 7 25 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 4.0%
Action 8 15 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 368 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,191 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 30, 2024 15/367,605 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 18, 2022 14/938,227 Reversed N/A
Aug. 31, 2021 15/854,676 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 13, 2020 14/860,797 Affirmed §103
Nov. 3, 2020 14/429,060 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.