AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jamel M Nelson

Examiner Jamel M Nelson appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 65.9%, they average 1.68 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.68
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-8174
Predicted Supervisor
Katelyn Smith
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5545
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1740 - Tires, Adhesive Bonding, Glass/Paper Making, Plastics Shaping and Molding

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
416
Granted Applications
274
Non-Granted Applications
142
Avg OA / Grant
1.68
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1743 , 1744
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 65.9% 1.68
Art Unit 25 57.5% 1.96
Group 195 53.9% 2.05
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 6 4 66.7%
2017 45 26 57.8%
2018 38 23 60.5%
2019 47 35 74.5%
2020 31 26 83.9%
2021 37 30 81.1%
2022 35 30 85.7%
2023 49 40 81.6%
2024 47 32 68.1%
2025 57 28 49.1%
2026 24 0 0.0%

274 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 412 0.2% 2.9% 79.9% 4.6%
2 180 0.0% 0.6% 88.9% 4.4%
3 71 0.0% 1.4% 90.1% 5.6%
4 27 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 3.7%
5 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 0.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
1.2%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.