AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jeremiah Smith

Examiner Jeremiah Smith appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 52.9%, they average 2.46 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.46
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7005
Predicted Supervisor
Joseph Del Sole
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1130
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1720 - Fuel Cells, Batteries, Solar Cells, Liquid Crystal Composition

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
817
Granted Applications
432
Non-Granted Applications
385
Avg OA / Grant
2.46
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1723 , 1744 , 1791
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 52.9% 2.46
Art Unit 35 48.2% 2.05
Group 253 48.9% 2.20
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 7 1 14.3%
2009 23 9 39.1%
2010 51 17 33.3%
2011 40 15 37.5%
2012 48 18 37.5%
2013 51 24 47.1%
2014 63 40 63.5%
2015 51 36 70.6%
2016 54 33 61.1%
2017 47 28 59.6%
2018 38 26 68.4%
2019 50 34 68.0%
2020 46 26 56.5%
2021 33 21 63.6%
2022 43 35 81.4%
2023 39 25 64.1%
2024 48 31 64.6%
2025 60 13 21.7%
2026 25 0 0.0%

432 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 812 0.0% 6.4% 82.1% 3.4%
2 572 0.0% 5.2% 83.6% 4.2%
3 298 0.0% 4.0% 88.9% 3.0%
4 203 0.0% 3.4% 88.7% 5.9%
5 106 0.0% 3.8% 89.6% 2.8%
6 71 0.0% 2.8% 90.1% 2.8%
7 31 0.0% 0.0% 87.1% 3.2%
8 17 0.0% 11.8% 82.4% 0.0%
9 11 0.0% 0.0% 63.6% 27.3%
10 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%