AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Nicholas J Chidiac

Examiner Nicholas J Chidiac appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 41.7%, they average 2.21 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.21
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2018-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-6131
Predicted Supervisor
Sam Xiao Zhao
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5343
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1740 - Tires, Adhesive Bonding, Glass/Paper Making, Plastics Shaping and Molding

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
247
Granted Applications
103
Non-Granted Applications
144
Avg OA / Grant
2.21
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1744 , 3763 , 3783
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 41.7% 2.21
Art Unit 22 53.3% 2.05
Group 195 53.9% 2.05
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2018; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2018 4 3 75.0%
2019 34 17 50.0%
2020 22 10 45.5%
2021 27 14 51.9%
2022 32 19 59.4%
2023 26 17 65.4%
2024 31 13 41.9%
2025 48 10 20.8%
2026 23 0 0.0%

103 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 269 0.0% 12.6% 76.6% 5.6%
2 184 1.1% 16.3% 64.7% 10.9%
3 86 3.5% 16.3% 66.3% 8.1%
4 53 1.9% 9.4% 71.7% 11.3%
5 24 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
6 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
3.1%
2023
1.7%
2024
2.2%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.