Examiner Nicholas J Chidiac

Grant ratio: 39.2% (17th percentile in Art Unit 1744 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.21. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 39.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.21
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93907
Primary art unit
1744
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
263
Granted applications
103
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6131
Supervisor
Sam Xiao Zhao
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5343

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 48.0% 2.05
Group 211 48.8% 2.05
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.42 689 office actions across 285 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 285 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 85 29.8%
2 OAs 107 37.5%
3 OAs 38 13.3%
4 OAs 29 10.2%
5+ OAs 26 9.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 50.0% 2019 2020: 45.5% 2020 2021: 51.9% 2021 2022: 59.4% 2022 2023: 65.4% 2023 2024: 41.9% 2024 2025: 26.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20184375.0%
2019341750.0%
2020221045.5%
2021271451.9%
2022321959.4%
2023261765.4%
2024311341.9%
2025381026.3%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 285 0.0% 12.3% 76.5% 5.6%
Action 2 200 1.5% 16.0% 65.0% 10.0%
Action 3 93 3.2% 15.1% 67.7% 7.5%
Action 4 55 1.8% 9.1% 72.7% 10.9%
Action 5 26 3.8% 0.0% 84.6% 0.0%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 5.9%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.8% 7 of 252 office actions
All years 1.2% 8 of 689 office actions
Change +1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
2024: AI examples
1.7%
2025: August memo
2.2%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 19, 2025 17/012,488 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 16, 2025 17/662,858 Reversed §103
Jan. 22, 2024 16/116,314 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2023 15/844,150 Reversed §101 · §103 · §112
Jun. 28, 2023 15/807,443 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.