Examiner Kimberly K. Mcclelland

Grant ratio: 13.2% (2nd percentile in Art Unit 1745 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 13.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.29
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
68397
Primary art unit
1745
Work group
1740
Technology center
1700
Applications
53
Granted applications
7
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2372
Supervisor
Alexa Neckel
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2450

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 51.9% 2.06
Group 214 47.7% 2.05
Tech Center 1,810 43.6% 2.14
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 124 office actions across 53 applications
Applications with office actions 96.2% 51 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 3.8%
1 OA 22 41.5%
2 OAs 17 32.1%
3 OAs 0 0.0%
4 OAs 7 13.2%
5+ OAs 5 9.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 0.0% 2009 2010: 42.9% 2010 2011: 0.0% 2011 2013: 0.0% 2013 2019: 0.0% 2019 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 50.0% 2021 2025: 37.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
2009200.0%
20107342.9%
2011700.0%
2013100.0%
2019100.0%
2020400.0%
20212150.0%
20258337.5%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 51 0.0% 7.8% 70.6% 7.8%
Action 2 29 0.0% 17.2% 69.0% 6.9%
Action 3 12 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 4 12 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 5 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 43 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 124 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 7, 2013 12/267,133 Reversed N/A
Feb. 16, 2013 11/779,580 Reversed N/A
Jan. 9, 2013 10/950,028 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 25, 2012 11/762,103 Affirmed §103
Oct. 11, 2012 11/272,991 Affirmed §103
Aug. 7, 2012 11/128,998 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 27, 2012 11/027,285 Affirmed §103
Dec. 21, 2011 11/057,061 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 24, 2011 11/051,125 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.