AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Hana C Page

Examiner Hana C Page appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 49.4%, they average 2.56 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.56
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
10 years (2017-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1578
Predicted Supervisor
Phillip Tucker
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1095
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1740 - Tires, Adhesive Bonding, Glass/Paper Making, Plastics Shaping and Molding

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
389
Granted Applications
192
Non-Granted Applications
197
Avg OA / Grant
2.56
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1745
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 49.4% 2.56
Art Unit 21 61.2% 2.06
Group 195 53.9% 2.05
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2017; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2017 19 10 52.6%
2018 37 19 51.4%
2019 38 24 63.2%
2020 47 22 46.8%
2021 28 18 64.3%
2022 36 19 52.8%
2023 49 31 63.3%
2024 50 33 66.0%
2025 63 16 25.4%
2026 22 0 0.0%

192 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 382 0.8% 4.2% 83.8% 5.8%
2 268 0.7% 1.9% 87.3% 3.7%
3 134 0.0% 1.5% 86.6% 5.2%
4 79 1.3% 1.3% 88.6% 3.8%
5 39 0.0% 0.0% 89.7% 5.1%
6 21 0.0% 0.0% 81.0% 4.8%
7 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 16.7%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.9%
2021
0.7%
2022
1.5%
2023
0.9%
2024
0.0%
2025
4.5%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.