Examiner Susan D. Leong

Grant ratio: 63.1% (75th percentile in Art Unit 1756 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 63.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.29
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86819
Primary art unit
1756
Work group
1750
Technology center
1700
Applications
529
Granted applications
334
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1487
Supervisor
Alexa Neckel
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2450

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 6 51.9% 2.37
Group 103 31.8% 1.92
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.21 1,205 office actions across 546 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 546 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 217 39.7%
2 OAs 153 28.0%
3 OAs 83 15.2%
4 OAs 52 9.5%
5+ OAs 41 7.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 15.8% 2009 2010: 39.6% 2010 2011: 61.2% 2011 2012: 52.1% 2012 2013: 70.5% 2013 2014: 69.6% 2014 2015: 76.5% 2015 2016: 72.5% 2016 2017: 56.5% 2017 2018: 81.5% 2018 2019: 76.5% 2019 2020: 94.4% 2020 2022: 50.0% 2022 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200919315.8%
2010481939.6%
2011493061.2%
2012482552.1%
2013614370.5%
2014463269.6%
2015513976.5%
2016402972.5%
2017462656.5%
2018544481.5%
2019342676.5%
2020181794.4%
20222150.0%
2024300.0%
2025300.0%
2026700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 546 0.7% 2.9% 69.6% 6.0%
Action 2 329 0.0% 2.7% 76.3% 6.1%
Action 3 176 0.6% 1.7% 83.0% 4.5%
Action 4 93 0.0% 0.0% 86.0% 4.3%
Action 5 41 0.0% 2.4% 82.9% 9.8%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 25 office actions
All years 0.4% 5 of 1,205 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.2%
0.6%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 23, 2017 14/040,018 Affirmed §103
Oct. 19, 2016 11/910,382 Affirmed §103
May. 31, 2016 12/024,762 Reversed §103
Apr. 6, 2015 11/734,444 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 29, 2013 12/117,557 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 27, 2012 11/828,412 Affirmed §103
Mar. 15, 2012 11/677,782 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.