Examiner Ibrahime A. Abraham

Grant ratio: 24.4% (8th percentile in Art Unit 1756 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.21. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 24.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.21
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87891
Primary art unit
1756
Work group
1750
Technology center
1700
Applications
352
Granted applications
86
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5569
Supervisor
Marivelisse Santiago-Cordero
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7839

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 6 51.9% 2.37
Group 103 31.8% 1.92
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.80 1,075 office actions across 384 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 384 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 95 24.7%
2 OAs 125 32.6%
3 OAs 47 12.2%
4 OAs 64 16.7%
5+ OAs 53 13.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 18.8% 2011 2012: 25.9% 2012 2013: 15.7% 2013 2014: 30.6% 2014 2015: 26.1% 2015 2016: 33.3% 2016 2017: 34.9% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018 2020: 0.0% 2020 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201132618.8%
2012581525.9%
201351815.7%
2014491530.6%
2015461226.1%
2016421433.3%
2017431534.9%
201811100.0%
2020200.0%
2025800.0%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 384 0.0% 5.2% 72.9% 1.0%
Action 2 289 0.0% 2.4% 77.2% 2.1%
Action 3 164 0.0% 1.2% 78.0% 2.4%
Action 4 117 0.0% 1.7% 81.2% 1.7%
Action 5 53 0.0% 0.0% 83.0% 1.9%
Action 6 31 0.0% 3.2% 87.1% 0.0%
Action 7 20 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 5.0%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 39 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,075 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 5/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 6/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 4, 2019 13/954,012 Affirmed §102
Feb. 22, 2018 13/899,278 Reversed §103
Jan. 26, 2018 12/543,721 Affirmed §103
Sep. 28, 2017 12/922,485 Affirmed §103
Apr. 10, 2017 12/853,254 Affirmed §103
Feb. 28, 2017 13/301,718 Affirmed §103
Jan. 23, 2017 13/528,027 Reversed §103
Oct. 28, 2016 13/397,779 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Aug. 31, 2016 13/342,766 Affirmed §103
Mar. 3, 2016 11/931,336 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Oct. 29, 2015 12/238,279 Reversed N/A
Jan. 22, 2015 11/859,138 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.