Examiner Steven Rosenwald

Grant ratio: 56.3% (36th percentile in Art Unit 1759 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.35. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 56.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.35
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87764
Primary art unit
1759
Work group
1750
Technology center
1700
Applications
364
Granted applications
205

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 9 53.4% 1.85
Group 103 31.8% 1.92
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 906 office actions across 393 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 393 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 140 35.6%
2 OAs 121 30.8%
3 OAs 66 16.8%
4 OAs 36 9.2%
5+ OAs 30 7.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 39.1% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 52.4% 2013 2014: 53.3% 2014 2015: 48.7% 2015 2016: 65.3% 2016 2017: 69.2% 2017 2018: 60.6% 2018 2019: 57.1% 2019 2020: 63.6% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201123939.1%
2012341750.0%
2013422252.4%
2014452453.3%
2015391948.7%
2016493265.3%
2017392769.2%
2018332060.6%
2019492857.1%
202011763.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 393 0.3% 9.4% 79.4% 9.9%
Action 2 253 2.0% 13.0% 71.5% 13.0%
Action 3 132 0.0% 12.1% 64.4% 22.7%
Action 4 66 3.0% 4.5% 74.2% 16.7%
Action 5 30 3.3% 6.7% 83.3% 6.7%
Action 6 14 7.1% 0.0% 78.6% 14.3%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.1% 10 of 906 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
5.4%
2019: PEG
1.0%
4.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 8, 2022 15/305,410 Affirmed §101 · §112
Apr. 14, 2021 14/010,792 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 21, 2020 15/145,669 Reversed §103 · §112
Jul. 17, 2020 14/890,757 Reversed §103
Jul. 2, 2020 14/632,731 Affirmed §103
Aug. 21, 2018 13/805,186 Affirmed §103
Nov. 10, 2016 13/190,623 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 7, 2016 12/469,874 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 22, 2015 12/776,689 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.