Examiner Khanh T. Nguyen

Grant ratio: 71.4% (75th percentile in Art Unit 1761 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.09. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 71.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.09
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83288
Primary art unit
1761
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,103
Granted applications
788
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8082
Supervisor
Angela Brown-Pettigrew
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2817

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 53.5% 1.87
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.05 2,260 office actions across 1,103 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 1,088 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 15 1.4%
1 OA 468 42.4%
2 OAs 338 30.6%
3 OAs 138 12.5%
4 OAs 74 6.7%
5+ OAs 70 6.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 43.5% 2008 2009: 59.1% 2009 2010: 69.1% 2010 2011: 71.4% 2011 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 73.1% 2013 2014: 82.9% 2014 2015: 77.2% 2015 2016: 80.0% 2016 2017: 77.0% 2017 2018: 76.4% 2018 2019: 74.3% 2019 2020: 89.4% 2020 2021: 79.6% 2021 2022: 78.0% 2022 2023: 88.0% 2023 2024: 88.6% 2024 2025: 59.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008462043.5%
2009663959.1%
2010553869.1%
2011634571.4%
2012694666.7%
2013785773.1%
2014826882.9%
2015574477.2%
2016655280.0%
2017614777.0%
2018554276.4%
2019705274.3%
2020474289.4%
2021544379.6%
2022594678.0%
2023504488.0%
2024353188.6%
2025543259.3%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,088 0.4% 16.8% 70.5% 8.9%
Action 2 620 0.0% 14.4% 74.4% 8.7%
Action 3 282 0.0% 11.0% 78.4% 5.7%
Action 4 144 0.0% 6.3% 83.3% 6.9%
Action 5 70 0.0% 4.3% 88.6% 4.3%
Action 6 35 0.0% 2.9% 88.6% 8.6%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 84.6% 7.7%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 230 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 2,260 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 30, 2017 13/010,686 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2016 13/225,603 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 20, 2013 11/942,766 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 15, 2013 12/485,837 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 15, 2010 11/563,723 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.