Examiner Katie L. Hammer

Grant ratio: 69.0% (60th percentile in Art Unit 1761 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.81. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2025
Grant ratio 69.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.81
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85804
Primary art unit
1761
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
838
Granted applications
578

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 53.5% 1.87
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.83 1,537 office actions across 838 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 836 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 433 51.7%
2 OAs 238 28.4%
3 OAs 86 10.3%
4 OAs 49 5.8%
5+ OAs 30 3.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 33.3% 2009 2010: 43.6% 2010 2011: 48.5% 2011 2012: 62.2% 2012 2013: 78.3% 2013 2014: 65.4% 2014 2015: 57.5% 2015 2016: 71.2% 2016 2017: 87.9% 2017 2018: 85.5% 2018 2019: 80.0% 2019 2020: 72.6% 2020 2021: 88.7% 2021 2022: 78.2% 2022 2023: 71.7% 2023 2024: 73.9% 2024 2025: 46.5% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008400.0%
2009451533.3%
2010391743.6%
2011331648.5%
2012452862.2%
2013463678.3%
2014523465.4%
2015402357.5%
2016664771.2%
2017665887.9%
2018554785.5%
2019655280.0%
2020624572.6%
2021534788.7%
2022554378.2%
2023463371.7%
2024231773.9%
2025432046.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 836 0.6% 3.8% 86.2% 6.2%
Action 2 403 0.0% 3.2% 92.1% 4.2%
Action 3 165 0.0% 1.2% 90.9% 7.3%
Action 4 79 0.0% 0.0% 94.9% 5.1%
Action 5 30 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.8% 1 of 118 office actions
All years 0.3% 5 of 1,537 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.9%
1.1%
1.3%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 6/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 5, 2025 17/072,806 Reversed N/A
Dec. 20, 2023 16/253,946 Affirmed §103
May. 29, 2018 14/101,395 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jun. 22, 2017 12/940,805 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 6, 2014 12/266,756 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 29, 2013 11/814,146 Reversed N/A
Feb. 28, 2013 12/214,773 Affirmed in part N/A
Nov. 28, 2012 11/973,431 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 26, 2011 11/317,374 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.