Examiner William Cheung

Grant ratio: 84.0% (81st percentile in Art Unit 1762 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.63. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2021
Grant ratio 84.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.63
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77925
Primary art unit
1762
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,218
Granted applications
1,023

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 54.2% 1.90
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.64 2,002 office actions across 1,218 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,214 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.3%
1 OA 747 61.3%
2 OAs 288 23.6%
3 OAs 94 7.7%
4 OAs 49 4.0%
5+ OAs 36 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 32.9% 2008 2009: 70.7% 2009 2010: 78.4% 2010 2011: 86.7% 2011 2012: 88.9% 2012 2013: 90.7% 2013 2014: 90.1% 2014 2015: 90.5% 2015 2016: 91.8% 2016 2017: 95.4% 2017 2018: 90.9% 2018 2019: 89.0% 2019 2020: 91.1% 2020 2021: 94.8% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008762532.9%
20091238770.7%
20101118778.4%
2011988586.7%
2012908088.9%
2013544990.7%
2014817390.1%
2015958690.5%
2016989091.8%
2017878395.4%
2018777090.9%
2019918189.0%
2020797291.1%
2021585594.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,214 1.0% 26.1% 45.6% 8.8%
Action 2 467 0.4% 22.9% 60.0% 7.7%
Action 3 179 0.6% 19.6% 67.0% 6.7%
Action 4 85 0.0% 23.5% 64.7% 7.1%
Action 5 36 0.0% 33.3% 61.1% 2.8%
Action 6 14 0.0% 35.7% 57.1% 7.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.7% 15 of 2,002 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.4%
0.5%
1.9%
0.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.9%
3.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 22. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 15 reversed.

Full reversal rate
71.4% 15/21 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
76.2% 16/21 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 16, 2019 15/406,607 Reversed §102
Nov. 29, 2016 12/479,052 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Jan. 22, 2013 11/708,943 Dismissed N/A
Dec. 19, 2012 11/002,144 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 18, 2012 12/077,765 Affirmed §102
Dec. 23, 2011 11/840,411 Reversed N/A
Nov. 10, 2011 10/492,754 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 18, 2011 10/939,803 Reversed N/A
Oct. 5, 2011 11/324,738 Reversed N/A
Aug. 30, 2011 11/223,167 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 27, 2011 11/498,336 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 18, 2011 11/213,374 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.