Examiner Elizabeth Eng

Grant ratio: 46.6% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 1762 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.99. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2018
Grant ratio 46.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.99
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86573
Primary art unit
1762
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
326
Granted applications
152

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 54.2% 1.90
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.37 1,225 office actions across 363 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 363 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 77 21.2%
2 OAs 71 19.6%
3 OAs 61 16.8%
4 OAs 67 18.5%
5+ OAs 87 24.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 20.0% 2009 2010: 69.6% 2010 2011: 48.4% 2011 2012: 40.7% 2012 2013: 48.8% 2013 2014: 42.5% 2014 2015: 45.0% 2015 2016: 42.9% 2016 2017: 31.6% 2017 2018: 57.1% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200915320.0%
2010463269.6%
2011311548.4%
2012592440.7%
2013412048.8%
2014401742.5%
2015401845.0%
201621942.9%
201719631.6%
201814857.1%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 363 0.8% 5.8% 75.2% 5.0%
Action 2 286 0.3% 6.3% 81.5% 3.1%
Action 3 215 0.0% 5.1% 86.5% 2.8%
Action 4 154 0.0% 4.5% 90.9% 2.6%
Action 5 87 0.0% 3.4% 88.5% 4.6%
Action 6 57 0.0% 1.8% 87.7% 7.0%
Action 7 33 0.0% 0.0% 93.9% 0.0%
Action 8 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,225 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.5%
0.6%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 32. Merits outcomes: 26 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
18.8% 6/32 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
18.8% 6/32 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 27, 2019 12/806,894 Affirmed §103
Oct. 24, 2019 14/436,412 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 24, 2019 13/725,003 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120
Jul. 8, 2019 14/365,438 Affirmed §103
Jun. 8, 2018 12/736,148 Reversed §103
Sep. 30, 2016 12/477,826 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2016 11/921,270 Affirmed §103
Sep. 28, 2016 11/884,653 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 26, 2016 12/305,217 Affirmed §103
Sep. 14, 2016 13/508,903 Affirmed §103
Jul. 27, 2016 12/227,663 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 20, 2016 12/861,349 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.