Examiner Bijan Ahvazi, Ph.D

Grant ratio: 57.7% (55th percentile in Art Unit 1763 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.20. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 57.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.20
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85085
Primary art unit
1763
Work group
1760
Technology center
1700
Applications
1,303
Granted applications
752
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3449

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 52.6% 2.12
Group 170 51.2% 2.03
Tech Center 1,792 44.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.27 2,960 office actions across 1,303 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,303 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 437 33.5%
2 OAs 464 35.6%
3 OAs 163 12.5%
4 OAs 154 11.8%
5+ OAs 85 6.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 29.5% 2008 2009: 41.9% 2009 2010: 44.4% 2010 2011: 67.7% 2011 2012: 79.6% 2012 2013: 61.4% 2013 2014: 56.8% 2014 2015: 74.4% 2015 2016: 62.7% 2016 2017: 78.9% 2017 2018: 65.4% 2018 2019: 65.9% 2019 2020: 66.7% 2020 2021: 63.3% 2021 2022: 72.3% 2022 2023: 70.4% 2023 2024: 67.2% 2024 2025: 40.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008441329.5%
2009743141.9%
2010813644.4%
20111339067.7%
2012937479.6%
20131016261.4%
2014744256.8%
2015826174.4%
2016593762.7%
2017383078.9%
2018523465.4%
2019412765.9%
2020543666.7%
2021603863.3%
2022654772.3%
2023543870.4%
2024583967.2%
2025421740.5%
20269800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,303 0.2% 12.7% 79.0% 4.8%
Action 2 866 0.0% 9.2% 86.5% 2.2%
Action 3 402 0.0% 5.7% 88.6% 4.0%
Action 4 239 0.0% 2.9% 92.9% 1.3%
Action 5 85 1.2% 4.7% 92.9% 1.2%
Action 6 41 0.0% 4.9% 90.2% 2.4%
Action 7 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.2% 1 of 437 office actions
All years 0.1% 4 of 2,960 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 27, 2025 17/349,995 Affirmed §103
Nov. 22, 2016 13/585,526 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 23, 2013 11/343,099 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jan. 31, 2013 11/659,900 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Aug. 22, 2012 11/352,553 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 29, 2011 11/427,944 Reversed §103
Sep. 7, 2011 10/566,967 Dismissed N/A
Feb. 18, 2011 11/446,894 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.